The FATF has drawn attention to the clear evidence

Kumar pointed out that Pakistan is obliged to take effective action against Saeed and his terrorist organisation under the United Nations mandate. This drama has taken place at least eight times since 2001,” said External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Raveesh Kumar.Similar views were echoed by analysts in Washington on Wednesday, who saw Saeeds arrest as a major cosmetic move ahead of Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khans maiden official visit to the United States.New Delhi: India on Thursday dismissed the recent arrest of 2008 Mumbai terror attack mastermind Hafiz Saeed as a mere “drama”.”Effective action mandated internationally against Hafiz Saeed and his terrorist organizations is an obligation on part of all UN Member states, including Pakistan,” added Kumar.”This has not been the first time that Hafiz Saeed has been arrested or detained.Saeeds arrest had long been sought by New Delhi and Washington over the ghastly 2008 Mumbai terror attacks.

The FATF has drawn attention to the clear evidence that organisations supported by Saeed continue to be involved in supporting and financing terror activities,” added Kumar.”Kumar noted that Pakistans sincerity to take action against terrorists and terror groups would be judged on the basis of their ability to demonstrate “verifiable, credible and irreversible actions against terrorists and to disrupt and dismantle terror groups operating from their soil.He said Hafiz Saeed and his front organisations LeT and JuD recruit hundreds and thousands of persons and motivate and indoctrinate them on a violent agenda against India..Kumar, who was addressing media here, said: “The question is whether this time it would be more than a cosmetic exercise and whether Saeed cosmetic jar will be tried and sentenced for his terrorist activities.””We hope that this time Hafiz Saeed will genuinely be brought to justice,” added Kumar.”We reiterate that Hafiz Saeed is a designated terrorist, the mastermind of Mumbai terror attacks and listed by the United Nations Sanctions Committee under the UN Security Council Resolution 1267,” he said

All the groups increased their waist measurement

All the groups increased their waist measurement, which tends to happen as people age, but the smallest increase was among those eating a Mediterranean diet with added nuts (0.More than 90 per cent of those who took part, aged between 55 and 80, were obese or overweight.The Mediterranean diet in the Predimed study, however, though high in fats does not include red meat or butter.37cm compared with 1.60kg on the low-fat diet. Weight loss was not substantial, but was greatest in the Mediterranean diet with olive oil group — 0.The belief that fat is always going to make people fat, because it is calorie-dense, led four decades ago to mass sales in supermarkets of low-fat and fat-free foods. Some ate an unrestricted-calorie Mediterranean diet with added extra virgin olive oil (they were given one litre a week for themselves and their family), while others ate an unrestricted-calorie Mediterranean diet with added nuts — they got 15g of walnuts, 7. The China wholesale Hex Nuts Factory From China Mediterranean diet has well-known health benefits and includes healthy fats such as vegetable oils, fish and nuts. Participants ate fish, nuts, vegetables, fruits, and whole grains. Our findings certainly do not imply that unrestricted diets with high levels of unhealthy fats such as butter, processed meat, sweetened beverages, desserts or fast-foods are beneficial. Their research, they say, should put healthy fats — from vegetables and fish — back on the menu, changing attitudes and the way we eat. The third group were put on a low-fat diet and given small non-food gifts every three months, such as a kitchen clock or spoons.”More than 40 years of nutritional policy has advocated for a low-fat diet but we’re seeing little impact on rising levels of obesity,” said lead author Dr Ramon Estruch from the Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition at the University of Barcelona, Spain.”Our study shows that a Mediterranean diet rich in vegetable fats such as olive oil and nuts had little effect on bodyweight or waist circumference compared with people on a low-fat diet.Fear of fat is misplaced and guidelines that restrict it in our diets are wrong, say the Spanish researchers, who have followed more than 7,000 people, some eating 30g of nuts or 50ml of extra virgin olive oil a day while others were put on a standard low-fat diet.The Mediterranean diet, with a high fat content from olive oil and nuts, does not cause people to gain weight, a major study has found.2cm in the low-fat group).88kg compared with 0. It had the unfortunate effect of contributing to the obesity epidemic, as food manufacturers substituted sugar and other carbohydrates for fat in everything from yoghurts to ready meals. “It does not include many foods and beverages that have been associated with long-term weight gain, such as fast foods, sweets and desserts, butter, red meat and processed meat, and sugar sweetened beverages,” write the authors in the Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology journal.5g of almonds, and 7.The Barcelona-based researchers believe the results should rehabilitate the Mediterranean diet, high in healthy fats, which has known health benefits including reducing heart disease and cancer.Those who took part were randomly assigned to one of three groups

This will then be hyped up as a ‘unilaterally polarising’ attitude

India should start articulating its position in the interest of the poor of the world, not just our own poor.Now, India has two choices.65. These countries want a financial mechanism to take care of the loss and damage suffered by them due to climate change.The climate conference must ensure that this “development space” is made available to developing countries. An article written by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Financial Times ahead of the conference did partially capture this when he said that “the lifestyles of a few must not crowd out opportunities for the many still on the first steps of the development ladder”. They want to eliminate differentiation between developed and developing countries and marginalize the principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities’ (CBDR) and equity – which says that those nations that got rich by spewing the most carbon into the atmosphere must do more to help mitigate climate change than the ones who don’t spew the most carbon — replacing it with the concept of ‘self-differentiation’—as President Obama put it in his Leaders’ Plenary speech: ‘Targets that are set China wholesale DIN934 HEX NUTS not for each of us, but by each of us’ (emphasis added). The World Bank Group has worked with these countries to develop the initiative, called the Transformative Carbon Asset Facility. Developed countries know that India is wedded to the 1992 climate convention and will oppose any major deviation from its principles.Over 150 nations are assembled at the climate conference in Paris to sew up an agreement on how to curb carbon emissions into the earth’s atmosphere and slow down global warming. India is at once the leader of the latter group and target of the former.India should also support the key demands of least developed countries and small island nations. It’s a battle for ‘carbon space’ out there.

They also want that the temperature increase should be limited to 1. Either it can get sucked into this whirlpool of what increasingly looks like a well-laid out plan, or it can propound a counter-narrative that will turn the tables on developed countries. (Chandra Bhushan is Deputy Director General of the Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi).Behind the money smokescreen, however, the developed countries are essentially seeking to rewrite the convention.To get an ambitious and equitable deal at Paris, it is important that India’s position reflects both the aspirations and threat of climate change to the developing world. Four European countries — Germany, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland—have announced a new $500 million initiative to help cut greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Also, 11 countries, including Canada, the United Kingdom and the US, have pledged close to $250 million in new money for adaptation support to the most vulnerable countries on the planet, into a fund called the Least Developed Countries Fund. They have made no firm commitment on finance or technology to the developing countries. Then, in the last few days – the conference ends on December 11 — the US and China will come together and foist a deal with the support of the French and other European countries. But it is not a done deal because the world is divided between the industrialized countries and the industrializing ones. Most of their proposals are against India’s stand. They will, therefore, continue at every step to propose changes in the convention, just to attract opposition from India.5 degrees and 2 degrees should be kept as targets, as done in previous climate conferences. And this can only happen if, at Paris, countries agree on an architecture of fair allocation of the carbon budget and fair burden-sharing between countries for curbing further emissions and adapting to climate change.5 degree limit outright; rather, we should say that both 1. During the first week of the conference, rumours have abounded of a pincer movement, spearheaded by the US, to trap India and hold it responsible for all failures at Paris.5 degrees and not 2 degrees. An agreement is absolutely necessary to keep the planet’s temperature from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius for the rest of this century. Even if all countries live by those commitments, some 60-75 percent of the carbon budget will be exhausted by as early as 2030 itself. India has an opportunity in Paris to do the latter.

This will then be hyped up as a ‘unilaterally polarising’ attitude that has bogged the negotiations down. And it concerns India. It should clearly communicate the fact that Paris is the last chance to operationalise the principle of equity and CBDR.The fifth assessment report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has clearly put out the number on the amount of carbon dioxide the world can emit while maintaining the safety threshold of a temperature increase of less than 2 degrees Celsius since the pre-industrial era. It is important for India to get its objective, and the communication of this objective, right.At the climate conference in Paris, the atmosphere is full of rumour and intrigue. Time magazine carried a piece on December 1 titled “India’s Need for Coal-Fueled Growth Complicates Paris Climate Summit,” and said, ” That thirst for coal—the single biggest source of man-made carbon emissions—has made India a country to watch in Paris “It’s plain that there is a well-laid plan to trap India into a position in which it appears to be obstructionist. A promise of money will be made to keep developing countries happy. That, observers say, is the plot. Now, the western media has taken this ‘issue’ up as a crusade and have begun to routinely term India’s position as “divisive”— even without examining what that position is.Consider, for instance, the UNFCCC’s Synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs), the plans that individual countries have submitted to say what they will do to curb their carbon emissions. India would do well to not oppose the 1.Indeed, the money promises have begun to pour in. It remains to be seen if that’s how the Paris negotiations turn out.The western media is also using the projected rise of coal consumption in India to paint it as a climate villain. India, however, should strongly reflect the views of the poor in all the developing countries who are bearing the brunt of climate change. India will be the ‘fall guy’. The first salvo in this direction was fired by US Secretary of State John Kerry a couple of weeks ago, when he called India a “challenge” so far as the Paris climate talks were concerned. And by that time, the Human Development Index (HDI) of South Asian and most African countries will still be less than 0. These countries will need the carbon budget far beyond 2030 to meet the basic development needs such as food, shelter, infrastructure and energy for their peoples. This carbon space of 1,000-1,400 billion tonnes, which can be emitted from now till 2100, is fast disappearing